The report evaluates the impact of the US-Iran 'Versailles' Memorandum of Understanding on the Strait of Hormuz. It concludes that while energy flows have improved, deep-seated disagreements make a return to military tension the most likely base case outcome.
Key Takeaways
- 1.A 14-point US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding has led to a 60-day window for negotiations, but four major areas of disagreement remain.
- 2.The report identifies three logical outcomes: a US retreat, an Iranian economic opening, or a return to military tension after the US midterms.
Table of Contents
- Summary
- The MoU of Versailles: an armistice for 20 weeks?
- Misunderstanding 1: Hormuz tolls
- Misunderstanding 2: Sanctions
- Misunderstanding 3: Uranium
- Misunderstanding 4: Lebanon
- Yet it's open and shut re: Hormuz for now
- Swiss watch - for what?
- Outcome 1: Iran wins - a TACO diet
- Outcome 2: US wins - and per-Iran-stroika
- Outcome 3: New tensions > new actions
- Conclusion: No plain Versaille-ing on this Odyssey
Document Preview
Access the Full Report
Get unlimited access to institutional research reports with a 14-day free trial.
Authors
Michael Every
Themes
Geopolitical TensionOil Supply Security
Regions
Middle EastUnited StatesIranLebanon
