The Cost of Being Too Liquid

Macro ThematicPrivate MarketsReal EstateRates CreditOther

This report explores the benefits of the 'illiquidity premium' and argues that high-net-worth investors should adopt institutional-style 'illiquidity buckets' to enhance long-term returns.

Key Takeaways

  • 1.Private markets like private equity, private credit, and real estate have historically provided an 'illiquidity premium' over public market equivalents.
  • 2.High-net-worth investors should consider an 'illiquidity bucket' of 10%–20% for capital they can commit for 7–10 years to capture higher long-term returns.
  • 3.New 'evergreen fund' structures (interval and tender-offer funds) are expanding private market access to HNW investors with lower minimums and more flexible liquidity than traditional funds.

Table of Contents

  • Key points
  • What does the data show?
  • High-net-worth demand
  • How much should advisors allocate to illiquid investments?
  • Allocating to private markets
  • The behavioral benefits of illiquidity
  • Conclusion
  • Contributors
  • Definitions
  • Methodology for Exhibit 1
  • WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
  • IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

Document Preview

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of The Cost of Being Too Liquid
Subscribe for full access

Access the Full Report

Get unlimited access to institutional research reports with a 14-day free trial.

Authors

Tony DavidowPriya Thakur

Securities

SPXYale EndowmentCliffwater Direct Lending IndexMSCI ACWI Total Return Index

Themes

Illiquidity PremiumEvergreen Fund InnovationBehavioral Finance and Loss Aversion

Regions

GlobalNorth AmericaUnited States