Franklin Templeton Institute
May 25, 2026
The Cost of Being Too Liquid
Macro ThematicPrivate MarketsReal EstateRates CreditOther
This report explores the benefits of the 'illiquidity premium' and argues that high-net-worth investors should adopt institutional-style 'illiquidity buckets' to enhance long-term returns.
Key Takeaways
- 1.Private markets like private equity, private credit, and real estate have historically provided an 'illiquidity premium' over public market equivalents.
- 2.High-net-worth investors should consider an 'illiquidity bucket' of 10%–20% for capital they can commit for 7–10 years to capture higher long-term returns.
- 3.New 'evergreen fund' structures (interval and tender-offer funds) are expanding private market access to HNW investors with lower minimums and more flexible liquidity than traditional funds.
Table of Contents
- Key points
- What does the data show?
- High-net-worth demand
- How much should advisors allocate to illiquid investments?
- Allocating to private markets
- The behavioral benefits of illiquidity
- Conclusion
- Contributors
- Definitions
- Methodology for Exhibit 1
- WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
- IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION
Document Preview
Access the Full Report
Get unlimited access to institutional research reports with a 14-day free trial.
Authors
Tony DavidowPriya Thakur
Securities
SPXYale EndowmentCliffwater Direct Lending IndexMSCI ACWI Total Return Index
Themes
Illiquidity PremiumEvergreen Fund InnovationBehavioral Finance and Loss Aversion
Regions
GlobalNorth AmericaUnited States
